Brandi Glanville has a new interview in an Australian publication (via Radar), and I have to admit, I really like the way Brandi comes across here. I’m Team Brandi by default, because LeAnn Rimes is so incredibly insane, but in the past I’ve had my doubts about Brandi’s part in keeping this C-list Bermuda Triangle alive. She’s very graphic in this interview, both about her own sexuality and about her anger towards LeAnn. She doesn’t seem like the most mature person, true – but she seems really honest about everything. Real Housewives of Beverly Hills star Brandi Glanville doesn’t hold anything back in an explosive new Q&A with Australia’s NW HQ magazine, including a bombshell revelation that she once felt like killing ex-husband Eddie Cibrian’s new wife LeAnn Rimes after the country singer surfaced at one of her son’s soccer practices. “I remember walking up to soccer practice and there she was with my baby in her lap,” Brandi — who has two sons with Eddie, Mason and Jake — told the magazine. “My blood was boiling, and I thought I was going to kill her. I really thought I was going to physically hurt her. But that was the first time I saw her that way — she was sitting in my soccer chair, under my tent, she’s got my kid on her lap and she’s with my husband, and that was that little moment of total irrational fury.” Brandi, 39, says tempers have cooled off on that front. “We’re never going to be best friends, but she’s good to my kids, they love her and that’s all I could ask for,” Brandi said. “If they didn’t like her, I’d be in court right now, fighting. It’s not about me — it’s about them.” In regards to recent rumblings that Eddie and LeAnn have been heavy-handed in allowing the boys to appear on Real Housewives with their mom, Brandi says it’s “incredibly hypocritical [for] Eddie to object to filming around my children, especially given how public he lives his life.” In the telling chat, Brandi says she’s glad to hear rumors Eddie and LeAnn didn’t sign a prenuptial agreement, as she’s happy her sons will have financial security regardless of if their TV actor dad makes it last with the country singer. “Thank God [they don't have a pre-nup]! My kids’ futures will be taken care of if that’s true,” Brandi said, adding she and Eddie had no agreement either upon tying the knot, which left her regretting that decision when the marriage imploded. “I got f**ked,” she said. “And not in a good way.” In a saucy send-off, the hardbodied beauty admitted that while she’s made love to women, she ultimately prefers the company of a man. “I’ve done that: I like tuna — it’s fine — but it’s not my thing,” she said. “I definitely need c**k in my life.” [From Radar ] Regarding Brandi’s comment, “….that was the first time I saw her that way…” – I always find it interesting to remember that LeAnn and Dean Sheremet socialized with Brandi and Eddie. They were couple-y social friends. And then LeAnn and Eddie starting having an affair, and Eddie went back to Brandi and then LeAnn started stalking Eddie, showing up wherever he was for months and months until everybody had enough. It’s always nice to go back and review. So, Brandi first knew LeAnn as a wife to Dean Sheremet, and as her husband’s mistress. So… I can understand Brandi’s rage when she saw LeAnn with her children. Photos courtesy of WENN, Fame/Flynet.

The rest is here: 
Brandi Glanville “thought she was going to kill” LeAnn Rimes at one point

Robert Pattinson celebrated his 26th birthday at Claridge’s Hotel in London this evening. He played host to friends like Hugh Jackman and a pregnant Sienna Miller . It was back to the city for Robert after he spent the weekend with Kristen Stewart in the English countryside, where she was busy with press duties for Snow White and the Huntsman . The duo stayed together at the Bailiffscourt Hotel in West Sussex, England, a spot just 15 minutes from Kristen’s work duties at Arundel Castle. The last week has been extra busy for Kristen. She jetted to Paris for a round of interviews on behalf of her new movie, which is out on June 1, before moving on to the UK. View Slideshow ›

Go here to read the rest: 
Robert Pattinson Gets His Friends Together For a 26th Birthday Bash

Mariah Carey and her husband Nick Cannon hit the town in NYC last night to attend the 2012 Project Canvas Exhibition and Art Gala. The event was held at the city’s Opera Gallery, and was designed to raise money for art programs in NYC schools. Mariah was on hand to support Nick, who hosted. She tweeted, “At Nick’s launch for project canvas. The shoes. . . Come on. . . A winner!” It was Nick and Mariah’s latest special night. They were just in Paris to renew their vows in honor of their fourth wedding anniversary. Their children went along for the European excursion as well. Moroccan and Monroe Cannon’s first birthday was on April 30, as Mariah welcomed them last year on her and Nick’s third anniversary. View Slideshow ›

Read the original post:
Mariah Carey and Nick Cannon Leave the Babies at Home For an Adults-Only Night Out

Ah, #TwilightGirlProblems… Kristen Stewart is in Paris, and she accidentally boarded the wrong private jet on the way back to London… So here she is crossing the tarmac to board the right flight.  Not exactly the drama that most 22-year-old girls go through, but it is K-Stew after all.  Check out these pictures of the Snow White and the Huntsma n star’s airport accident. 

See the rest here:
Kristen Stewart Boards Wrong Private Plane (Oops!)

My prediction was for late May. I theorized, weeks ago, that Charlize Theron would unveil her son Jackson closer to June, when she has two films coming out – Prometheus and Snow White & the Huntsman . But Charlize unveiled Jackson yesterday at Charles de Gaulle airport in Paris – which means that Jackson is getting some attention a month before Charlize’s dual press tours. So… Jackson. I’m still not sure how old this kid is. Charlize adopted him in… March. I think. We don’t actually know, because Charlize keeps her information locked down. The announcement came in March , and if I had to put a number on it, I’d say Jackson is about six months old, give or take two months. Is that a wide enough margin of error? I’m really terrible at guessing baby ages. Anyway, Jackson is super-cute. I love his expression of “OMG OMG OMG BRIGHT LIGHTS OMG.” He’s absolutely horrified. Charlize will totally teach him how to make the patented Theron bitchface soon enough. Trust it. Can I just say? I’m still really happy for Charlize. I’m glad that she didn’t feel the need to wait around for a man to come around and help her fulfill her dreams of being a mom. I do think she and Stuart Townsend were the real deal, and since they split several years ago, Charlize has been feeling unfulfilled in some way. She seems so much more relaxed now, right? PS… I love Jackson’s awesome little sweater. And his booties! Photos courtesy of WENN.

Excerpt from: 
Charlize Theron shows off her son Jackson in Paris: how cute is this little guy?

Poor Jessica Chastain. We’ve only very rarely seen her get it right on the red carpet . She’s worn some Alexander McQueen recently, and sort-of worked those dresses, according to some people. So it’s surprising to see her in such an unflattering, ill-fitting Louis Vuitton at the Met Gala. She’s skinny and it’s squeezing in her stomach area and making it look like she has a roll where there isn’t one. Her boobs look stuffed into a too-small bra-like top (a problem she’s had before ) and overall she just looks miserable. Look at the bedazzling along the lines of the dress. It’s awful. Jessica just dropped out of talks to star in Iron Man 3 , citing her busy schedule . Goop will be relieved to be rid of some competition. In contrast Heidi Klum looks happy as hell in this purple lace overlay Escada, and she has no reason to be. (Apart from being single, rich, gorgeous and having a nanny for each of her kids. I guess I get why she doesn’t GAF about her fashion.) That dress is straight from the 90s and the stacked cheap-looking necklace and bracelets just add to the dated effect. It even has a diagonal cut-out around the waist. Heidi’s pale makeup kind of works, though and I really like her hair like that. I can’t say the same for Jessica’s styling. You can see a closer photo of her here . Jessica has on almost no eye makeup coupled with very dark stained lips. Did she not look in the mirror and object to her makeup artist? How meek do you have to be to not say “put some eyeliner and mascara on me, bitch.” I would fire anyone who sent me out like that.

Here is the original:
Heidi Klum & Jessica Chastain in purple at the Met Gala: unflattering or fashionable?

Gwyneth Paltrow attended last night’s Met Gala, of course. She comes nearly every year, because it’s like the Mecca of Fashion Girls. Last night’s theme was “Schiaparelli and Prada ‘Impossible Conversations’” . So of course Dame Paltrow wore Prada, instead of her usual ass-kissy Stella McCartney. I actually thought this Prada WAS Stella at first, just because it seems like the cut is off somehow, which seems a hallmark of Stella McCartney’s designs: a bad fit. Anyway, this dress is like the fancier cousin of the mullet dress – it has the soul of a mullet dress, yet I would not really say that it’s a full-on mullet. The color – a pale, icy white-blue-silver (depending on the light) – seems pretty obvious for Goop. She loves her icy, artic colors. Thoughts on the side-boob? I really do think she had a boob job. Thoughts on the short dress to a gala event? Eh. Gwyneth wasn’t the only girl going with a shorter dress. I think if you’re ever going to wear a full-length gown, it should be to the Met Gala (and the Oscars), but I guess Goop considers herself to be a “fashion risk taker” and “rule-breaker”. Plus, she fancies herself ahead of the curve, mullet-wise. Overall, though, I don’t really hate this look on Gwyneth. It’s not groundbreaking, and it’s not surprising. It’s also not bad. The fit could be better, but… I don’t have a hate-on for it. Goop’s shoes are Prada too, by the way! I really like her shoes, they might be my favorite part. My least favorite part? Her hair. She needs to stop with the center part. Photos courtesy of WENN.

See more here: 
Gwyneth Paltrow in Prada at the Met Gala: mullet-y fugness or ice queen beauty?

Marion Cotillard spent Friday out and about in NYC with her son Marcel Canet. She was back to work on Saturday, though, doing a shoot in the West Village neighborhood. Baby Marcel is nearly 1 year old! The little guy turns on May 19, which is sure to be a big day for Marion and her fiancé Guillaume Canet. Marion and her son have been all over the globe in recent months, as they travel from their home base in Paris for work. Marion went to Pittsburgh and beyond to shoot The Dark Knight Rises with Christopher Nolan and a cast that included Christian Bale and Anne Hathaway - check out the latest Dark Knight Rises trailer ahead of the blockbuster’s July 20 release! She spent time during the Winter in Manhattan, working on an untitled project with director James Gray and costar Joaquin Phoenix . Later, Marion and Marcel moved on to Nice, France, for another picture. Marion’s current project is Blood Ties , which her Guillaume is directing. Guillaume is behind the lens shooting Marion as well as Mila Kunis , Zoe Saldana , and Clive Owen . View Slideshow ›

Here is the original:
Marion Cotillard Has a City Weekend With Baby Marcel

Friday’s story about Linda Evangelista’s child support case was a doozy, and it’s just going to get more intense with more testimony coming on Monday and Tuesday. From what I’ve read, it seems like the whole “Billionaire Francois-Henri Pinault asked Linda Evangelista to get an abortion ” thing happened on the first day of court. On the second day of the court case, Pinault and Evangelista both gave testimony about who said what and when. Pinault even spoke about (his now-wife) Salma Hayek’s pregnancy with Valentina, and how they thought for months that (still-in-utero) Valentina may have Down’s Syndrome. Oh, and Pinault’s lawyers claim that they had approached Linda with offers of child support, and SHE was the one who gave them the silent treatment, which is a direct contradiction of Linda’s earlier claims (and the reason for the this whole child support case). Here’s more: Her first job ever — picking cherries at age 12, on a farm in Ontario — got her $10 a day. Her first modeling job — for a hometown newspaper ad — paid just $8 an hour. Supermodel Linda Evangelista took the witness stand yesterday in her contentious court battle with billionaire French baby daddy Francois-Henri Pinault, describing her cash-strapped beginnings as a prelude to the big- money child-support pitch she’ll make Monday. “Fifty cents a basket,” Evangelista said when asked what the pay was for that first job 35 years ago. This from a woman who once declared that supermodels don’t get out of bed for less than $10,000. Evangelista continues to command $100,000 for the occasional runway appearance, the still-glamorous catwalker testified. She also spends more than $46,000 per month, she says, on Augustin, her 5-year-old son by Pinault, the CEO of the Paris-based luxury conglomerate that owns Gucci and Yves Saint Laurent. Pinault would meet, impregnate and marry actress Salma Hayek within a year of fathering “Augie” — and has been less than a model dad, Evangelista’s lawyer has contended. The model and the mogul had been together only seven days when Evangelista announced her pregnancy. Pinault suggested she abort the baby, she says — though Pinault denies that. He promptly dumped her, not conceding paternity until it was confirmed by a DNA test a full year after Augie’s birth. “My wife was pregnant,” Pinault explained of his decision to put baby Augie on a shelf that first year. “For five months, we were told the baby [had] Down syndrome,” he said of Valentina, his daughter by Hayek. “I [asked] Linda to postpone my recognition [of Augie] until after the birth of Valentina. It was very complicated situation. My wife almost lost the baby.” Pinault — who is worth some $3 billion and makes up to $5 million a year — paid not a single euro until last year, when a Manhattan magistrate set a temporary support amount, according to testimony. His lawyers are accusing the supermodel of cherry-picking facts. Pinault testified yesterday that his lawyers repeatedly broached the topic of support with Evangelista’s lawyers — and were met with silence. He spent $260,000 on “gifts” in 2010, Pinault told Support Magistrate Paul Ryneski matter of factly under questioning by Evangelista lawyer William Beslow. Pinault admitted that most of that money was for gifts for himself. “I have a watch collection,” he said. “It’s for when I buy a watch for me.” Did he recall buying any gifts at all for Augie in 2010, he was asked. “I bought him a present for his birthday and for Christmas,” he answered. Augie turned 4 in October of that year. What was the birthday present? Beslow asked. “I don’t remember,” Pinault said. And what was the Christmas gift? “It was . . . FAO Schwarz,” he fumbled. “I bought it online. It was a piano thing.” [From Page Six ] I said on Friday that I wasn’t really crazy about Linda or Francois-Henri. They both seemed kind of awful to me, but at this point, I’m definitely leaning more towards Linda. Sure, I still think the $46,000-a-month figure is kind of crazy, but as far as Linda’s side of the story… yeah, I think she’s the one telling the truth, or a more truthful version of what went down. Pinault made it seem like he acknowledged paternity of Augie very quickly when it’s clear he was shining Linda on, dragging it out for a long time until Linda forced the issue. I think Pinault fell in love with Salma and simply didn’t want to have to deal with all of the issues with Linda and Augie – and thus, he ended up treating Linda and Augie like crap. I also think Pinault’s lawyers are probably full of it as far as the “we offered her support years ago” thing – that version simply doesn’t make sense. As for Pinault and his “gifts” to himself… yeah. That looks really bad, especially when he can’t remember what he gave his son! Photos courtesy of WENN, Fame/Flynet and Pacific Coast News.

View post:
Linda Evangelista & Pinault testify about income, gifts & Salma Hayek’s pregnancy

Offering up the long-awaited video for fans, Kanye West has debuted the visual component for “Lost in The World,” a two-year-old track. The song, which features notes from Bon Iver, was released on the rapper 2010 album “My Beautiful Dark Fantasy.” As for the clip itself, West joined forced with filmster Ruth Hogben and delivers some artistic angles that prompted a warning stating “Like “N***as in Paris,” the clip features strobe effects.” Make sure you check out the “Lost in The World’s” black and white footage below and let us know what you think!

Go here to read the rest:
Kayne West Drops "Lost in The World" Video: Watch Now!