Here’s “Glee” star Lea Michele surprising the $#!! out of me by dropping some of the sexiest cleavage I’ve ever seen while on her way to her “Late Show with David Letterman” taping last night… sweet Christmas! Yeah, I don’t believe it either my peeps. But it’s true as you can clearly see for yourselves;
Original post:
Lea Michele Drops Some Damn Sexy Cleavage!
Here’s everyone’s favorite pussycat Nicole Scherzinger looking absolutely stunning, and unleashing her ridiculously sexy curves and drool-inducing cleavage in one hell of skin-tight dress at the Berlin premiere of “Men In Black 3”. Say it with me my peeps… sweet Christmas! And as if Nicole’s booty curves and plentiful cleavage wasn’t enough to knock you
See the original post:
Nicole Scherzinger’s Insanely Sexy Curves Will Make You So Delirious You’ll Be Singing That Will Smith “Men In Black” Song
Here’s a whole slew of screen caps of my absolute favorite ginormously bosomed celebrity babe, Kat Dennings, busting out her super huge cleavage in the last episode of her TV show “2 Broke Girls”. Say it with me my peeps… sweet Christmas! Wow… Kat is busting out so much cleavage that she has officially entered
See the original post here:
Kat Dennings Busts Out The Mega Cleavage
*Note: Angelina is not wearing her engagement ring in this photo, taken in Ecuador on April 22nd. In Touch Weekly has a story that is called, no joke, “Angelina Hates The Ring: Newly engaged Angelina Jolie thinks Brad Pitt doesn’t ‘get’ her.” Obviously. I’m including some photos of Angelina in the field during her April 22nd UNHCR trip to Ecuador – while she was in the field, meeting refugees, she was not wearing her ring. In Touch notes that she also wasn’t wearing her ring for the official meeting she had with Ecuador’s foreign minister. So what does it mean if Angelina doesn’t want to wear her $500,000 rock while she’s tending to her UNCHR duties? It means she hates Brad, of course. It’s only been a few weeks since Angelina Jolie and Brad Pitt announced their engagement. But as she met with the foreign minister of Ecuador on April 22, the ring finger on her left hand was noticeably bare. While some claim she thought the $500,000 sparkler wasn’t appropriate for a serious meeting, everyone knows that engagement rings are meant to be worn always. So why did Angelina really ditch the ring that Brad helped design himself? “She isn’t fond of it,” a friend confides. “Nothing against Brad’s design. She’s just never been enamored of white diamonds.” Indeed, the friend says Angelina had been hoping for a less traditional stone. “Emeralds are her favorite.” And she’s been complaining that Brad’s choice of the 10-carat diamond, rather than an emerald, “shows how little he knows her.” Of course, her hissy fit over the ring shows a lot about her, as well. “She’s so demanding,” an insider says. “She’s acting like a bridezilla.” [From In Touch Weekly , print edition] I like emeralds too, but I don’t think I would like an emerald engagement ring. But I’m a traditionalist like that… for the most part. If a dude was hellbent on NOT giving me a white diamond for an engagement ring, I would also accept a sapphire – just because those are MY favorite gemstones. I just feel like sapphires, emeralds, rubies and the like are better suited for anniversary presents or Christmas presents or birthday presents rather than an engagement ring. Once again, just me. As for Angelina not wearing her ring while she was in Ecuador – I get it. She didn’t want to wear her huge diamonds while she was in the field, working with poor refugees. She really only wears big, blinged-out pieces when she’s on the red carpet anyway, so I think of her normal, everyday style as pretty bling-less generally. So while I think Angelina probably loves her ring and plans to wear it most of the time, I hope Brad isn’t expecting her to wear it every day, no matter where she is or what she’s doing. Because that won’t happen. Photos courtesy of UNHCR/WENN.
Read more from the original source:
ITW: Angelina Jolie hates her engagement ring, didn’t wear it during a UNHCR trip
The Daily Mail has an extensive article/opinion/essay today about Duchess Kate’s epic hair. The thesis seems to be “Kate should cut her hair and find a more mature, professional and elegant hairstyle.” Which is a bit rich, because The Mail – and several other UK papers and tabloids – have treated Kate’s hair like “The Curls That Saved A Nation” ever since Kate and William got engaged. You can read The Mail’s piece here , and here are some highlights: No one can be in doubt that The Duchess of Cambridge has behaved impeccably in her first year of marriage to Prince William. Middle-class Middleton has crossed the class divide with grace — she’s courteous, elegant and never stops smiling, especially when her beloved husband is at her side. But is it just me or has something rather strange happened to Kate recently? It’s not her whittled-down waist. Nor is it her fashion sense, the love of High Street brands such as Reiss and LK Bennett, which earns her brownie points with the public and is turning her into a fashion icon. No, it’s those famous locks, which seem to be getting longer by the day. Her Royal Highness is turning into her Royal Hairness with that dark, glossy mane. And I’m wondering if now, a year on from her wedding, it might just be time for the chop. Now I’m not suggesting for a moment that Kate should be sporting a Mia Farrow crop or middle-aged bob. But the blanket of hair which arrives five minutes before she does has to go. Take last week, when Kate was greeting children at a charity event. Dressed in a dark blue tweed skirt and jacket, she looked stylish, professional and charmed everyone. Yet every time she bobbed down to talk to one of the youngsters, her face was completely obliterated by a cascade of dark curls. She would flick it out of the way, fondle and fiddle with it and I lost count of the number of times she had to tuck it behind her ear. At one point she looked like Cousin It from the Addams Family — all hair, no person. It was so distracting. Even Princess Diana realised early on in public life that people wanted to see her face. She cut her droopy bangs and settled for a much more sophisticated short style. It worked, showcasing her enormous blue eyes and strong features. So why is Kate clinging to her own over-long mane? Even she must have been infuriated by being overshadowed by her hair, because at her very next event she attended at the Imperial War Museum she’d put it in a back-teased half-up, half-down style. But even that style was more WAG than HRH. For goodness sake, she’s a member of the Royal Household now, not Cheryl Cole. Every time I see her fondling her hair I’m waiting for her to look into the cameras and coo: ‘Because I’m worth it.’ Kate’s mane has none of the elegance of Mary, the Crown Princess of Denmark, also a young woman of ordinary birth who has risen to the highest position in the land. On Kate and William’s trip to Copenhagen in the autumn, Mary’s shiny, shoulder-length brown hair looked far more elegant than the Duchess’s tumbling curls. Surely an image-conscious young woman like Kate can’t be oblivious to this? Yet there are probably a number things stopping her cutting her hair. First there is a long Royal tradition of establishing a look, then keeping it. The Queen is the perfect example. Apart from the colour, her hair has hardly changed since she took the throne six decades ago. Less successfully, Princess Anne revels in the same unflattering hairstyle (and the same frocks) she wore half a century ago. It’s widely known that Camilla’s hair-stylers have tried for years to tease her out of the rather dated 1970s Farrah Fawcett flick she’s been sporting since she was a girl. Yet she always responds: ‘Charles loves my hair this way.’ [From The Mail ] The piece goes on to say that Kate might be clinging to her long hair and sausage curls because that’s how she looked when she met William, and he may prefer her hair like that too. Another theory: Kate is clinging to the youthful long hair as a way to cling to her youth. The writer goes on to admit that she wore long hair for years, and she recently got four inches taken off (it now comes to her shoulders) and now she loves it and feels and looks younger. Which is always what the short-hair brigade says!!! Look, I have long hair too. My hair is probably about at Kate’s length. I love long hair. It suits me. I barely do anything to it (Indian genes!) and it looks fine. I don’t have an issue with Kate having long hair – at all. She had long hair in college and throughout her 20s, and this is the length that makes her comfortable, and so be it. My problem isn’t with the length – it’s how she styles it. In her 20s, before the engagement, Kate wore her hair in a much simpler fashion – like, she probably just gave herself a blow-out, and her hair had a natural wave, and it was fine. But since she’s become a royal, Kate is obsessed with the giant, time-consuming sausage curls, and the look is pretty tired. I’m exhausted just thinking about how long it takes her to get ready. The Mail is right on that count – her hair is simply “too big” in general, and “too big” specifically for public functions. Plus, she does spend so much of her time in front of the cameras fiddling with her hair, stroking it like a security blanket in outing after outing. My thesis: Kate just needs to learn how to style her hair and mix it up according to the occasion. For black tie events, her hair should be up. For professional day outings, do it half-up so it’s not in her face. Try French twists and chignons. And don’t fall back into the “sausage curl” comfort zone every single day. Photos courtesy of Fame/Flynet and WENN.
Here is the original:
Should Duchess Kate chop off her hair, or just learn how to style it?
There isn’t much to add after gushing over yesterday’s mega dose of eyeball-melting Candice Swanepoel bikini pictures, but I will say this about today’s new batch… sweet Christmas!!! Holy perfection personified Batman! Wow, will you get a load of those shwingtastic curves!? Ahem… C’mon, did you really think that I could shut up about my
Read more here:
More Drool-Inducing Candice Swanepoel Candid Bikini Pictures, Woohoo!
Hair today, gone tomorrow – that’s the lesson Cameron Diaz learned when a friend chopped off several inches from her hair. Just before Christmas, the What to Expect When You’re Expecting star visited a female friend’s house for a quick trim. It was a busy night in December and the 39-year-old told her she ‘just wanted a little bit off.’ When the actress saw how much of her hair was gone, she told Jay Leno she just ‘burst into tears and started crying.’
Read more here:
Cameron Diaz Cried After Getting Hair Chopped Off
She’s made it to the big time! Scarlett Johansson has been honoured with her own star on the Hollywood Walk of Fame. The actress teamed a monochrome Preen skirt and top with red peep toe Louboutin heels and Bulgari jewellery for her big ceremony. The 27-year-old wore her hair in a gorgeous set wave and used a slick of red lipstick to accentuate her lips to ooze old school Hollywood glamour on Hollywood Boulevard.
See original here:
Scarlett Johansson Gets Star on Hollywood Walk of Fame
Lovely mom, Mariah Carey was spotted out shopping at the Azzedine Alaia Store in Paris, France on Sautrday afternoon (April 28) topping off her romantic weekend. The “All I Want for Christmas is You” signer brought along her twins, Moroccan and Monroe but left her hubby, Nick Cannon after the two renewed their vows on Friday night (April 27), and she tweeted, “Tonight was an incredible night, I can’t express how amazing it was to renew our vows in Paris at the top of the Eiffel tower.” In career news, the 40-year-old singer recently announced that she will release a greatest hits album titled, The Essential Mariah Carey that will feature popular recordings from her albums in the nineties. “I wanted to create a collection of some of my favorite songs. Several of them are very big hits and some are more obscure favorites of mine as well as fan faves,” Miss Carey said about the two-disc set. It will be released on May 8.
Why I'm leaving Downton: It's one of the biggest shows on TV, but Samantha Bond says she's had enough of playing Lady Rosamund | UPDATED: 22:30 GMT, 27 April 2012 Samantha Bond has had it with Downton Abbey. The actress, who plays Lord Grantham’s sister, Lady Rosamund, says she’s fed up with ‘popping in and out’. Continue reading
Read the original post:
Why I"m leaving Downton: It"s one of the biggest shows
on TV, but Samantha Bond says she"s had enough of playing Lady Rosamund